Following a troubled week of riots across London and other major cities in England the Prime Minister has announced that every government policy will be under review to make sure that they can fix a "broken society." But how will these changes in Government policy actually be implemented? William Sharman investigates.
David Cameron has promised today that tackling the "broken society," will be top of the agenda and that he will speed up plans to improve parenting and deal with anti-social behaviour. In his speech he also said that he aims to *turn around the lives of the 120,000 most troubled families" by 2015 as well as pledging to start an "all out" war on gang culture. The PM described the rioting last week as a "wake up call for the country," and that the "worst of Britain," had been seen during the trouble. This all led to him concluding his speech by saying that the broken society was now back at the top of his agenda. He also talked about improving education for parents and children in less well off areas around the country.
As obvious and good ideas as these seem, there are however massive problems with actually implementing them. Firstly and perhaps most obvious is the cost involved. In an age in which public sector spending is being cut left, right and centre there is no room left in the budget for added social costs. The current economic plan is not producing the growth that the Chancellor hoped to see and with the added trouble from America and the Euro zone it looks like a fair while until there is any money to spend on extra social measures. My question then is how can Cameron and his government start an all out war on gangs as an example. Wars are expensive even in the metaphorical sense I am sure the PM means. The US has had a massive gang problem for years and has been able to do very little to tackle it but I suppose that's why we are trying to take some of their ideas and implement them into our policing. To bring in suitable changes that could help stop the gang problem would cost a fortune that this country cannot spare at the moment. So money is clearly an issue in the changes that the PM is proposing.
The second problem is that how do you actually go about improving the parenting and reducing anti-social behaviour in poorer areas of the country? In his speech Cameron included children without fathers, schools without discipline and communities without control as some of the main social problems that "have been festering for decades and have exploded in our face." How does the PM propose to tackle these problems though? Firstly how can you reduce the amount of children without fathers? This is a deep rooted problem with society and would be very hard to tackle. Maybe massive amounts of education could help to persuade fathers that staying with their families is better than leaving but I would imagine this advice would be ignored. Reducing the amount of teenage mothers would definitely help this problem but again this is a problem that the PM is going to find very hard to sort out. Education seems to be the only reasonable solution as well.
To increase discipline in schools would require extra funding but with the current economic climate as I mentioned earlier and with the academy plans for schools it seems it will be a long while before there is extra funding for poorer schools. One way to increase discipline though would be to try and reduce truancy rates but again this is a deep seated problem with society that the PM has to tackle as well. Maybe through larger punishments for not being in school as one solution but it is most likely down to how the parents react that will affect the children.
As for the communities without control problem I would imagine education for the parents is again the only solution but as with all these problems a massive amount of money and time will be needed and I am afraid that when the bare minimum is done to simply cover the problems up that the process of fixing the social problems will end.
My greatest fear is that we will simply patch the broken society back together and let it slowly fall apart all over again.
Monday, 15 August 2011
Friday, 29 July 2011
Belly dancing, Doctor Who and the Roman Empire, but what about work?
In a release of information the Department for Transport has disclosed a list of the 1000 most visited sites by its civil servants. Belly dancing, Doctor Who and Roman Empire websites were among the most popular but in a time of spending cuts is it right for these civil servants to be wasting time and money? William Sharman asks.
In a country where both public and private sector spending is heavily being cut in order to repair the mistakes of the previous Labour Governemnt you would imagine that everyone is working hard and efficently to reduce costs and preserve thier own jobs. Well according to the latest report published by the Department for Transport (DfT) many of their civil servants are not using thier time effectively.
The list of 1000 websites was published in response to a Freedom of Information request by campaign group the TaxPayers' Alliance. They cover the period from January to May this year. The BBC website was top with 7.4 million hits and Google, various newspapers and news blogs where also towards the top. However when you begin to look past the obvious sites this is when it becomes intresting. Facebook ranked highly with 130,000 hits. Argos is the most highly viewed shopping destination but other shops such as John Lewis, Debenhams and Next also feature. The list also contained many sports sites aswell as betting websites such as bet365.
But prehaps the most astonishing were the more unusual websites found in the list. With over 27,000 hits was bearsfaction.org.uk which is a role playing website that urges viewers to escape from reality. Even more popular, coming in at 115, is etiquettehell.com which gives frustrated sticklers for good manners a forum in which to vent.There were also big numbers of hits for a London delly dancing site and a fans of the Roman Empire site which compined scored well over 100,000 hits. My personal favourite though is Sexymp.co.uk which gets users to rank MP's in order of attractiveness and this site achieved a good 21,000 hits in the three month period. For anyone intrested Penny Mordaunt Conservative MP for Portsmouth North came first and for the men Dominic Raab Conservative MP for Esher and Walton was placed highest.
However what is the revlevance of this information you may ask. Well its is yet another example of the problems that are still rooted into the heart of the civil service. There is almost no other job in the World that you would be able to get away with surfing the web when you are meant to be working. But for some reason when you become a civil servant you have a different set of rules from any other workplace in both the private and public sector. The reason for this is because of the fundamental principles given to civil servants when they take up thier jobs. Despite the removal of anonymity from the core principles of civil servants in 2006 the other principles allow many civil servants to get away with what many would consider inappropraite behaviour. The principle of permanance still remains and it allows civil servants to act with no worries about the consequences. The last civil servant to be sacked for gross misconduct was almost 100 years ago for Wiskey smuggling. Now I am not saying that the principle of permanence should be removed as it is a vital part of the civil service but there needs to be some large changes.
So this is the problem, civil servants act in a way not sutiable in any other work place but are allowed to due to thier security of tenure and other key principles given to them. This needs to change or I am sure that there will be many more events like this one I have talked about today and frankly why should the rules be different for them?
In a country where both public and private sector spending is heavily being cut in order to repair the mistakes of the previous Labour Governemnt you would imagine that everyone is working hard and efficently to reduce costs and preserve thier own jobs. Well according to the latest report published by the Department for Transport (DfT) many of their civil servants are not using thier time effectively.
The list of 1000 websites was published in response to a Freedom of Information request by campaign group the TaxPayers' Alliance. They cover the period from January to May this year. The BBC website was top with 7.4 million hits and Google, various newspapers and news blogs where also towards the top. However when you begin to look past the obvious sites this is when it becomes intresting. Facebook ranked highly with 130,000 hits. Argos is the most highly viewed shopping destination but other shops such as John Lewis, Debenhams and Next also feature. The list also contained many sports sites aswell as betting websites such as bet365.
But prehaps the most astonishing were the more unusual websites found in the list. With over 27,000 hits was bearsfaction.org.uk which is a role playing website that urges viewers to escape from reality. Even more popular, coming in at 115, is etiquettehell.com which gives frustrated sticklers for good manners a forum in which to vent.There were also big numbers of hits for a London delly dancing site and a fans of the Roman Empire site which compined scored well over 100,000 hits. My personal favourite though is Sexymp.co.uk which gets users to rank MP's in order of attractiveness and this site achieved a good 21,000 hits in the three month period. For anyone intrested Penny Mordaunt Conservative MP for Portsmouth North came first and for the men Dominic Raab Conservative MP for Esher and Walton was placed highest.
However what is the revlevance of this information you may ask. Well its is yet another example of the problems that are still rooted into the heart of the civil service. There is almost no other job in the World that you would be able to get away with surfing the web when you are meant to be working. But for some reason when you become a civil servant you have a different set of rules from any other workplace in both the private and public sector. The reason for this is because of the fundamental principles given to civil servants when they take up thier jobs. Despite the removal of anonymity from the core principles of civil servants in 2006 the other principles allow many civil servants to get away with what many would consider inappropraite behaviour. The principle of permanance still remains and it allows civil servants to act with no worries about the consequences. The last civil servant to be sacked for gross misconduct was almost 100 years ago for Wiskey smuggling. Now I am not saying that the principle of permanence should be removed as it is a vital part of the civil service but there needs to be some large changes.
So this is the problem, civil servants act in a way not sutiable in any other work place but are allowed to due to thier security of tenure and other key principles given to them. This needs to change or I am sure that there will be many more events like this one I have talked about today and frankly why should the rules be different for them?
Tuesday, 26 July 2011
Dave and George, 100% happy?
Following a shrink of 0.3% in the UK economy from last quarter and reports of friction between the No. 10 and the Treasury, the PM has issued a statement saying he is 100% behind his Chancellors growth plan. But just how strong is the relationship between George Osborne and David Cameron?
0.2% was the reported growth of the UK economy between April and June of this year down from 0.5% in the first quarter of the year. Take into consideration the 0.5% shrink from the last quarter of 2010 and the reports from the Telegraph saying that there where concerns that there was too much focus on cutting the deficit. Then it is understandable why the PM's and the Chancellors relationship has started to appear in the media spotlight.
David Cameron however has said that he and George Osborne are "one team" and are both working together on the same plan to get the economy growing again. This is hardly surprising coming from the man that stuck with his decision to hire Andy Coulson until the bitter end. Of course I am not saying that the PM and the Chancellors relationship is in anyway endangered like the relationship between the PM's and his ex head of communications. Mr Osborne and Mr Cameron have been friends and colleagues ever since their Oxford days and the PM has always fully supported his Chancellor in all his plans and ideas. But with the added pressure of the hacking scandal, Boris up to his old tricks and a slow moving economy is there really a rift
forming between the two men.
I would have to say no. With all the pressure at the moment and the spotlight only momentarily being taken off the PM due to the Norwegian atrocities, Mr Cameron needs to make sure he has a strong relationship with the Treasury rather than another source of stress. This would of course be easier for the PM if the economy was growing at a faster rate. Saying this though, as the Chancellor points out the plan is "creating jobs and providing stability," and this has to be of some importance to the country.
The Chancellor also needs the PM as much as the PM needs him, as he comes under more pressure from the Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls. Mr Balls has accused the Chancellor of being in "denial" and blamed the VAT rise and spending cuts for the slump in growth. Although knowing Mr Osborne he will be able to repel this attack in Parliament while also raising a few laughs from his colleagues and I'm sure the Prime Minister will only be too willing to also join in the defence.
So with the PM under extra pressure to prove his worth and the Chancellors economic recovery plan not performing as well as he had hoped. I fully expect the pair to stick together and not let a rift form between the two of them but as for what will actually happen well I suppose only time will tell. Maybe if some more stressful and damaging events present themselves to the PM then we might have a problem.
0.2% was the reported growth of the UK economy between April and June of this year down from 0.5% in the first quarter of the year. Take into consideration the 0.5% shrink from the last quarter of 2010 and the reports from the Telegraph saying that there where concerns that there was too much focus on cutting the deficit. Then it is understandable why the PM's and the Chancellors relationship has started to appear in the media spotlight.
David Cameron however has said that he and George Osborne are "one team" and are both working together on the same plan to get the economy growing again. This is hardly surprising coming from the man that stuck with his decision to hire Andy Coulson until the bitter end. Of course I am not saying that the PM and the Chancellors relationship is in anyway endangered like the relationship between the PM's and his ex head of communications. Mr Osborne and Mr Cameron have been friends and colleagues ever since their Oxford days and the PM has always fully supported his Chancellor in all his plans and ideas. But with the added pressure of the hacking scandal, Boris up to his old tricks and a slow moving economy is there really a rift
forming between the two men.
I would have to say no. With all the pressure at the moment and the spotlight only momentarily being taken off the PM due to the Norwegian atrocities, Mr Cameron needs to make sure he has a strong relationship with the Treasury rather than another source of stress. This would of course be easier for the PM if the economy was growing at a faster rate. Saying this though, as the Chancellor points out the plan is "creating jobs and providing stability," and this has to be of some importance to the country.
The Chancellor also needs the PM as much as the PM needs him, as he comes under more pressure from the Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls. Mr Balls has accused the Chancellor of being in "denial" and blamed the VAT rise and spending cuts for the slump in growth. Although knowing Mr Osborne he will be able to repel this attack in Parliament while also raising a few laughs from his colleagues and I'm sure the Prime Minister will only be too willing to also join in the defence.
So with the PM under extra pressure to prove his worth and the Chancellors economic recovery plan not performing as well as he had hoped. I fully expect the pair to stick together and not let a rift form between the two of them but as for what will actually happen well I suppose only time will tell. Maybe if some more stressful and damaging events present themselves to the PM then we might have a problem.
Monday, 25 July 2011
Youtube channel
Here is the forementioned Youtube channel. If you would have a look it would be very much appreciated.
http://www.youtube.com/user/PrimeMinisterJNR?feature=mhee
http://www.youtube.com/user/PrimeMinisterJNR?feature=mhee
Introduction blog
Well hello there fellow bloggers,
My name is William Sharman or the young conservative if you have seen my youtube videos. Basically I wanted to join the world of blogging and felt I was missing out by only being on Youtube. So here I am. I will be writing two politically related articles every week about issues in the news that intrest me. I hope you enjoy them and please leave any feedback as you wish.
Right then shall we being?
My name is William Sharman or the young conservative if you have seen my youtube videos. Basically I wanted to join the world of blogging and felt I was missing out by only being on Youtube. So here I am. I will be writing two politically related articles every week about issues in the news that intrest me. I hope you enjoy them and please leave any feedback as you wish.
Right then shall we being?
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)